# EMQX + Home Assistant setup Broker for this deployment: **EMQX 6.0.1 at 192.168.1.31**. Note that EMQX 6.x still serves its management API under `/api/v5` for backward compatibility — the API path is not a version indicator. ## 0. Broker state Probed 2026-08-14, before and after the authenticator was created: | Check | Before | After | |---|---|---| | Listeners 1883 / 8883 / 8083 / 8084 / 18083 | all open | all open | | Anonymous MQTT connect | **accepted** | refused (bad username or password) | | Connect with a made-up username/password | **accepted** | refused (not authorized) | | Connect as `soil-node` from `secrets.h` | n/a | accepted | | Publish to `soil/#` | allowed | allowed | | Publish to `homeassistant/sensor/#` | allowed | allowed | | Retained publish + replay to a new client | works | works | | Management API (`/api/v5/clients`) | protected, HTTP 401 | protected | | Public `/api/v5/status` | 200 (normal, by design) | 200 | The "before" column is what an EMQX install looks like with **no authenticator configured**: every client on the LAN can connect, subscribe to `#`, and publish anywhere — including to `homeassistant/...` discovery topics, meaning anything on the network could create or overwrite entities in Home Assistant. In that state the `MQTT_USER` / `MQTT_PASSWORD` values in `secrets.h` are decorative: EMQX accepts them without checking, so a node connecting successfully proves nothing about whether the credentials are correct. Re-run the check at any time: ```bash python3 tools/check_broker.py ``` ## 1. Enable authentication in EMQX ✅ done Dashboard → **http://192.168.1.31:18083** 1. **Access Control → Authentication**, then **Create** (top right) 2. Mechanism **Password-Based**, Backend **Built-in Database** → Next 3. Configure: - **UserID Type**: `username` (matches the CONNECT packet's Username field, which is what `MQTT_USER` in `secrets.h` sets) - **Password Hash**: `bcrypt` - **Salt Rounds**: 10 (valid range 5–10; higher is better) 4. Create. The moment an authenticator exists, EMQX stops accepting anonymous connections. Existing sessions stay up until they next reconnect, so there is a grace period — but create the accounts in step 2 immediately, and expect Home Assistant to fall off the broker until you give it credentials too. ## 2. Create one account per client Click the authenticator row you just created, then the **Users** tab → **Add**: | Username | Used by | |---|---| | `soil-node` | every ESP32 node (they share this account; the MQTT *client id* is what stays unique, derived from each MAC) | | `homeassistant` | the HA MQTT integration | Separate accounts matter here: it lets you write the ACLs in step 3, and it means rotating the node credential doesn't knock HA off the broker. Use long random passwords. Generate them where they will not land in a terminal transcript, e.g. write straight to a file: ```bash openssl rand -base64 24 > ~/soil-node.pass # then open the file to read it ``` ## 3. Restrict what each account may do (recommended) **Access Control → Authorization → Built-in Database**, then add rules. For `soil-node` — it only ever publishes, and never subscribes: | Action | Topic | Permission | |---|---|---| | Publish | `soil/#` | Allow | | Publish | `homeassistant/sensor/#` | Allow | | Subscribe | `#` | Deny | For `homeassistant`: | Action | Topic | Permission | |---|---|---| | Subscribe | `homeassistant/#` | Allow | | Subscribe | `soil/#` | Allow | | Publish | `homeassistant/status` | Allow | Then set **no-match action to `Deny`** in the authorization settings. Leaving it at the default `Allow` makes the rules above cosmetic — anything not explicitly matched is still permitted. ## 4. Fill in `include/secrets.h` Already pre-filled with the broker address. Replace the four `CHANGEME` values: ```c #define WIFI_SSID "..." #define WIFI_PASSWORD "..." #define MQTT_HOST "192.168.1.31" #define MQTT_PORT 1883 #define MQTT_USER "soil-node" #define MQTT_PASSWORD "..." ``` This file is gitignored. The broker IP is deliberately **not** in `secrets.h.example`, because that template is committed and the Gitea repo is public. ### Why port 1883 and not 8883 TLS is available on 8883, but PubSubClient over `WiFiClientSecure` means shipping a CA bundle and paying a full handshake on every deep-sleep wake — meaningful battery cost on the remote nodes for a sensor reading that is not confidential, on a LAN. Plain 1883 with per-account ACLs is the sensible trade here. Revisit if these ever cross a network you don't control. ## 5. Point Home Assistant at EMQX Settings → Devices & Services → **MQTT** → Configure. - Broker `192.168.1.31`, port `1883` - Username `homeassistant`, password from step 2 - Enable discovery, discovery prefix `homeassistant` (must match `HA_DISCOVERY_PREFIX` in `include/config.h`) If MQTT is already configured against a *different* broker, repoint it — nodes publishing to EMQX will never appear in an HA that is listening to Mosquitto somewhere else. This is the single most common reason a node looks healthy on the wire but produces no entities. ## 6. Flash and verify ```bash pio run -e mains -t upload -t monitor ``` Expected serial output: ``` === Soil Node A1B2C3 (aa:bb:cc:a1:b2:c3) fw 1.0.0 === profile: mains | publishing every 60s wifi: 192.168.1.x, rssi -55 mqtt: connecting to 192.168.1.31:1883 as soil-node-a1b2c3 discovery: publishing entities for soil-node-a1b2c3 state: {"node_id":"soil-node-a1b2c3","moisture_1":...} ``` Watch the broker side independently: ```bash python3 tools/mqtt_watch.py --host 192.168.1.31 --user soil-node ``` Then confirm in HA: Settings → Devices & Services → MQTT → *Soil Node XXXXXX* with 6 moisture entities plus the diagnostics. ## Troubleshooting `mqtt: connect failed, state N` — N is PubSubClient's code: | N | Meaning | Likely cause | |---|---|---| | 4 | Bad credentials | `MQTT_USER`/`MQTT_PASSWORD` don't match the EMQX user | | 5 | Not authorized | Authenticated, but ACL denied the connection | | 3 | Server unavailable | Broker reachable but refusing | | -2 | Connect failed | TCP never established — wrong IP, firewall, VLAN | | -4 | Connection timeout | Broker accepted TCP but never sent CONNACK | **Node publishes but no entities in HA.** Almost always HA pointed at a different broker (step 5), or a discovery-prefix mismatch. Check that `homeassistant/sensor/soil-node-xxxxxx/moisture_1/config` exists on the broker with the watcher script. **Entities appear then go *unavailable*.** On the mains profile that is the availability topic plus last-will doing its job — the node really did drop. On the battery profile it means `expire_after` elapsed, so the node missed more than ~2.5 sleep intervals. **Entities show *unknown* rather than a number.** That is the firmware reporting a probe outside its calibrated window as `null` on purpose, not a transport problem. See `CALIBRATION.md`.